Picons in channellist
- Thread starter roddiss
- Start date
paolino
Vu+ User+++
You need HDglass16 skin
Please, don't use it! Read here why http://www.vuplus-community.net/board/threads/hd-glass16-ver-6-87.9278/
angelofsky1980
BlackHole Driver Specialist
If your post is intended to demostrate working of HD Glass skin you are in the wrong place.
Users can use it AT THEIR FULL OWN RISK. The skin contains python coding thath break image and/or image performances.
Users who uses HD Glass skins cannot blame if their images doesen't works correctly.
Matrix10
Administrator
This has already become a farce
Do you really think that we can not add picons in channellist,
but even better if we think that it is good for the image performance.
Of course, these skins are not good for performance and stable image.
But if you like go ahead,
but do not complain here if image does not work well.
You may use CoolTV, it displays your epg and the picons too.
Regards.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
kaktus
Vu+ Newbie
I just wanted to show a possibility with regard to the question of the thread, maybe roddiss did not know this skin.
The fact that it is not officially supported, does not mean it can not be proved, also because in a few minutes you can create and reload a backup, so why close in on ourselves? I think your warning is right, but after it, people have to be free to try ( and mistake, eventually).
I don't understand... this skin is NOT SUPPORTED or is CENSORED???
I'm sorry your stress, i did not think to create so much anger.
Bye
The fact that it is not officially supported, does not mean it can not be proved, also because in a few minutes you can create and reload a backup, so why close in on ourselves? I think your warning is right, but after it, people have to be free to try ( and mistake, eventually).
I don't understand... this skin is NOT SUPPORTED or is CENSORED???
I'm sorry your stress, i did not think to create so much anger.
Bye
angelofsky1980
BlackHole Driver Specialist
HD Glass skin series contains python coding into skin and these kind of components can cause instability / bad performances into images. Their use is at 101% full risk of the user that cannot complain if the box doesen't work as expected if he use that skins.
paolino
Vu+ User+++
This is not a must to have, if it compromises the image just forget it. But it would be a cool feature to have in default image
It's not a good idea, default image skin has to be as small as possible to have the fast system and more free flash memory (Solo, Duo...).
Matrix10
Administrator
Once more I try to explain the situation with this skin
The skin does not have the support of our team
nor do we want to have publications on our forum
until it meets the BH skin requirements.
And that means no python coding in skin and good coding preferably without major bugs.
Why
The skin damaging work of our BH image
and coding in which is invested a lot of time
To ensure that our image users have a better image.
On the other hand
we've had a lot of bug issues on the forum where we concluded
that the users use this skin.
We have no time for examination and testing such bugs.
Of course, user can use it is his personal choice.
But we do not want to support
until it meets the BH skin requirements.
I hope it is now clearer
We have nothing against this skin and especially not against the author
But, protecting our work,and most users
which certainly do not want to re-install image for skin bugs.