Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This board is now closed. The Blackhole image ended in 2020.
The board will remain available in Read Only Mode, so all the posts from the last 15+ years are not lost.
We thank you for being part of the community for the last 15+ years.
You can join the OpenBh board if you have not already done so at www.openbh.net.
There is no difference between a SSD and a HDD as their logic is concerned.
And, as Nunigaia said, its illogic to use an USB connection when there is a Sata available.
Im thinking of buying either a solo or ultimo 4k. The solo only takes a 2.5 internal hdd and I have a 3.5 in my duo2 .. a couple of 3.5 spare hdds and the 3.5 ssd which will are unused.
So the price of a solo goes up by about £50 for a new drive.
@Alexwilmac.......Yes technically the ssd is the hdd if used but if I used a normal drive I think it would need external power to run it.
What do you mean by "normal" drive? A 3,5"? Yes, the 3,5 always need power but, apart for the NAS, I gave up with 3,5" because they are not needed any longer (because of the performances of 2,5" ones nowadays) and because they are uncomfortable to manage.
I'm not sure I understood well: is your SSD a 3,5"? If so, if very, very, very uncommon... and I understand why you want to reuse it.
Otherwise, the Solo4K has everything you need: mine's got two double tuners, one (double) for sat and one (double) for DVB-T; an internal 2,5" HDD (SSD in my case) whom I can pull out without the need of opening the box and whom I can immediately put within a open 2,5" USB3 box if I need to do something with it; there is another USB DVB-T tuner and, still, there are two other USB3 ports free...
I have to correct myself' I was going by the physical size of the drive and it turns out a 2.5 drive is actually 4 inches long ....so my drives are actually 2.5 ones.
so ideal for the solo 4k.That now makes the solo more tempting.Two tuners are fine for me.
Apart from the 4k is the solo in yur opinion a step up from the duo2
I have to correct myself' I was going by the physical size of the drive and it turns out a 2.5 drive is actually 4 inches long ....so my drives are actually 2.5 ones.
so ideal for the solo 4k.That now makes the solo more tempting.Two tuners are fine for me.
Apart from the 4k is the solo in yur opinion a step up from the duo2
Of course: because of many, many reasons. First of all, Solo4K is a 4K whilst Duo2 is a HD....
But, more importantly, it has got a more powerful CPU, more ram, a bigger flash... It's enough? Only the Ultimo4K is more powerful.
I don't use it for real 4K because my TV il FHD, but the other features are real.
And one more thing to add to all that: Solo4K has FBC tuner, like all 4K serie devices (except Zero 4K I guess). It has many superiorities over the classic tuner, BUT also one big disadvantage: There's no blind scan!
It's up to users to decide, according to their needs and preferences.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.