BlackHole Vu+ Solo 1.3.7 - oe 1.6

[lorenzo64]

BlackHole Vu+ Solo v. 1.3.7 - oe 1.6​

​

​

​

WHAT'S NEW?​

​

​

​

- Added wifi support​

​

- NEW: color terminal​

​

- fixed: Midnight Commander consolle file manager​

​

- fixed crash bug in System Info​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

DISCLAIMER​

THE BLACK HOLE IMAGE IS BASED ON THE OFFICIAL FIRMWARE PULBISHED BY VU+ AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW IT CONTAINS ONLY SYSTEM ADDITIONS & GRAPHIC CHANGES.​

THE BLACK HOLE IMAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY EMULATOR, K E Y S, SOFTCAMS OR OTHER SYSTEM FOR VIEWING PAY - TV WITH OR WITHOUT A PAID SUBSCRIPTION.​

LASTLY, THE BLACK HOLE IMAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SYSTEM TO DOWNLOAD PLUGINS OR EMULATORS FROM EXTERNAL SERVERS OR SOFTWARE THAT MAY BE USED FOR IILEGAL PURPOS​

​

​

LICENSE (TERM OF USE)​

THE BLACK HOLE IMAGE IS ISSUED FOR THE FREE USE FOR ALL USERS PROVIDED THAT IT WILL NOT BE CHANGED IN ANY WAY AND THAT IT WILL ONLY BE USED FOR LAWFUL PURPOSES.​

​

ANY CHANGES OR ADDITIONS TO BLACK HOLE IMAGE THAT INVOLVE UNLAWFUL USE OF THE IMAGE SUCH AS CARD-SHARING AND EMULATORS ARE NOT ALLOWED AND CAUSE THE REWOKE OF THIS LICENSE.​

 

[DanielFran]

Thanks guys for the update!

 

[Matrix10]

In connection to our VU solo image
and my first test with VU solo ...

I must be honest I was quite skeptical about the receiver possibility.
But after a few days of the test I was very surprised
How well does this receiver
Of course this is not VUplus Duo, but for the price to be paid for it
This set definitely belongs in the first line
The quality of images/picture on HD TV is a fantastic good
and does not lag behind for many more expensive receivers.
Zap speed is also enviably good especially if
you use/test some of the lighter skins.(example BlueNight2 no PIG on our server)

 

[valevale]

thanks guys
WLAN that's what was missing!!

I must be honest I was quite skeptical about the receiver possibility.
But after a few days of the test I was very surprised
How well does this receiver

My opinion is that vu+ solo works much better than any other DM 800 xxxx receivers (more or less same price)

Edit MX >Pls no clone stories/compare on this forum .Thanks MX

 

[Matrix10]

thanks guys
WLAN that's what was missing!!



My opinion is that vu+ solo works much better than any other DM 800 xxxx receivers (more or less same price)

Edit MX >Pls no clone stories/compare on this forum .Thanks MX

I would like to compare with original boxes
in relation to price and quality.

I think for me is this box rather big surprise
I was very skeptical
especially when it comes to quality TV picture
but also everything else.
Zap speed is much better especially on HD channels than the original DM800
The same goes for picture quality (more details)
size of the box and heating that here is no problem at all.
Cable connections are also easier here
Box have the ideal size for this type of SAT box.

BH image works excellent on this box and definitely in future we will see even more.

 

[^^corrado^^]

Best Team Best IMG tnxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

[Matrix10]

Best Team Best IMG tnxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

[paradise]

Image your team the best image Solo receiver is currently

 

[Vlada064]

Thanks Miro for this test.

I wait for some info about image from solo useres.

 

[Samoht]

My first steps with the new BackHole Image are down.

The look and feel is very good

But I need some more time to give a qualified feedback.

Cu, Samoht

 

[SOLO MAN]

Thanks for this very good image and appeal to all users of the VU + Solo to be "boring" to the team, because VU + Solo could fall into the background, which is not good, because it is a very good receiver and would love to see all the functions that have VU + Duo image (USB Tuner panel, etc. ..).

Best regards from Croatia!

 

[Samoht]

My first recordings (Sky Germany) with the Black Hole Image are not useable.

They seem to be keyed.

I use a alphacrypt light cam with S02 card.

Cu, Samoht

 

[altazia]

Thanks !

Altazia