Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exact problem for me here.
In my case I did the online update on the flash image first followed by the one in OMB. Maybe the image sees files already installed and installing again would 'break existing dependencies'.
Just guessing.
On zero4k im install image 4.3 when was out after install im daojf online updste when is out.Long time ago? The last update (with change of version's number) was last Friday, from 4.3.003 to 4.3.004. I'll try later today on Duo2.
But it seems an issue box-dependent, for what has been reported so far.
It is the same with Ultimo4K and Zero4K (I think it will be all boxes tbh).Same problem today on Duo2, despite the fact it was still at .003: it performed the update to .004, then I tried again to update and it gave the same error (by telnet, of course):
Not selecting libavformat58 4.1.4 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libavdevice58 4.1.4 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libavutil56 4.1.4 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libavcodec58 4.1.4 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libswresample3 4.1.4 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libavresample4 4.1.4 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libswscale5 4.1.4 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libavfilter7 4.1.4 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libpostproc55 4.1.4 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
So, at the moment we know for sure that the problem
AFFECTS Solo4K, Duo2, Uno4KSE, whilst we have different reports for Uno4K (Azam couldn't update, Artorious could);
DOES NOT AFFECT: Ultimo4K, Zero and probably Zero4K (I did not get, @bogdanm, if you tried again to update after Friday's .004 main update, because this is a new small update of the .004: as I said, the update from 003 to 004 goes well, the next doesn't).
But I just tested ViX 5.3 and it does the same, so it's an OE-A issue and not an OBH issue.