VU+ and CI+

Status
Not open for further replies.
paolino said:
Why don't you ask them?
Click to expand...
Code: 
http://www.galaxy-innovations.ru/en/catalogue?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=165&category_id=3
Hallo. How you can see this is the same product of Marusys. So сan anyone say, Black Hole team are going to support CI+ modules in their firmware?
There are many sat providers with CI+ modules in Eastern Europe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Currently the Trust Authority for the CI Plus standard is not going to provide CI+ license and compatibility certification to receivers based on open OS, and therefore, as things stand today, unfortunately we'll never see a linux based receiver compatible with CI+.

Code: 
http://www.trustcenter.de/products/consumer_electronics.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eragon said:
Currently the Trust Authority for the CI Plus standard is not going to provide CI+ license and compatibility certification to receivers based on open OS, and therefore, as things stand today, unfortunately we'll never see a linux based receiver compatible with CI+.

Code: 
http://www.trustcenter.de/products/consumer_electronics.htm
Click to expand...

What about recievers made by Octagon? They are linux based and all have CIP support.
Code: 
http://www.octagon-germany.eu/downloads/digital-receiver/hdtv-receiver/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Those Octagon CI+ receivers aren't open systems!;)

AFAIK their original OS (even if linux based) is embedded, locked and secured, you can't change anything in those receivers that is not directly provided with the manufacturer's approval.
Unfortunately their documentation is very poor and for example it's not possible to clearly understand if recording of CI+ decrypted channels is allowed (CI+ can restrict recording of copyrighted material).

BTW, I don't' know if anyone could ever install different images on those receivers, but in that case he will probably loose the original embedded CI+ security credentials granted to Octagon which allow a receiver to make use of its CI+ interface.
Possibility of hacking those receivers is another matter that falls outside the scope of this discussion.
 
Didi said:
Dreambox CI + Manager v1.4...................................................:idea:
:welcome:
Click to expand...
Ok... and now?
I'll remember ALL that CI+ implementation into other brand Linux boxes is a merely HACK and not the OFFICIAL support (paid to CI+ consortium for licenses and certs).
 
VTI VU+ image work to ci+ modules: Ab jetzt gibt es mit Solo SE, Solo² und Duo² die möglichkeit ein CI+ Modul zu nutzen. Is it possible to CI + support to new BlackHole img ?
 
RamasG said:
VTI VU+ image work to ci+ modules: Ab jetzt gibt es mit Solo SE, Solo² und Duo² die möglichkeit ein CI+ Modul zu nutzen. Is it possible to CI + support to new BlackHole img ?
Click to expand...
I've not tested VTI image, so I don't know how they implement CI+
 
My Friends, there are so many things that need licence this days, Myself doing lot of things, no licence at all, but never been arrested, payed fine etc, i have Worldwide licence called: licence for things that do need licence, LOL, now to be honest Vu+ is Hacking some things is well, i am not going to say what, but some people here may know what i am talking about, just be careful do not drive without driving licence??????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top