angelofsky1980
BlackHole Driver Specialist
But they are different machines with different hardware.... so the compare is not so easy ....I think dm900 is more attractive, because it has a display and place on hard disk.
But they are different machines with different hardware.... so the compare is not so easy ....I think dm900 is more attractive, because it has a display and place on hard disk.
But they are different machines with different hardware.... so the compare is not so easy ....
I think they have the same cpu( BCM 7252s), same memory (rom and ram). DM900 have front lcd and hdd 2.5 support and Vu+ doesn't.
Whe can install other E2 images on dreambox too. OpenATV is one of them!Maybe but at least you may install a lot of images in Vu+ thanks to LinuxI've read Dreambox boxes are running DreamboxOS which is proprietary.
BTW I have a question : Vu+ Uno 4K seems to me to be an improved Solo4K with a cheaper priceBut is the tuner and FBC Twin Tuner DVB-S2 ? (because its name is "Uno"
)
Yes but that's allWhe can install other E2 images on dreambox too. OpenATV is one of them!
Wait a minute....quality???Nobody writes about the quality only about LCD
![]()
Wait a minute....quality???
I'm a Solo2 owner....but dreambox is a very good quality set-top boxes....
We are talking about the best brands: Dreambox and Vu+.
I ordered a Dreambox DM900 and I think made a good choice.....my decision was pending between dm900 and Uno 4K..... But for the HDD slot and good specifications, I decided for dm900.
I`m affraid that price for Ultimo 4K will be around 700 euros for the basic unit.
http://www.orbitadigital.com/fr/90-vu
Hi,
Just to tell that DM stop innovate since the DM800, all what they release after was just an evolution of the DM800.
When I say that they just released their first 4K receiver last mount and still no FCB tuners in 2016!!
I think that they will join Blackberry and Kodak club
A+
Amine
Hi
Are you sure ? if you think you are right ? than i have to say
you have no idea what you are talking about
I have a Solo4K did i need the FBC Tuners ? NO i did not
i have an Rotor and Fixed antenna on Astra / Hotbird
thats enough for me.Did i need the FBC Tuners for record multiple Channels ?
No i don´t caus all and everything is repeated until vomiting
Did i need FCC ? No i don´t cause it´s still,also after a lot Driver Updates,
buggy.
So all possible advantages are for me uninteresting
And to the end don´t forget
what can i do with a good hardware if the software can not do anything with it,remember
DM uses in the mine time OE 2.2 or the newer OE 2.5 what uses VU ?
Enigma 1.8
OE version is quite useless and cannot be used to refer anything. If I want, I can release an image that follow OE 10.1 ....And to the end don´t forget
what can i do with a good hardware if the software can not do anything with it,remember
DM uses in the mine time OE 2.2 or the newer OE 2.5 what uses VU ?
Enigma 1.8
Hi
Are you sure ? if you think you are right ? than i have to say
you have no idea what you are talking about
I have a Solo4K did i need the FBC Tuners ? NO i did not
i have an Rotor and Fixed antenna on Astra / Hotbird
thats enough for me.Did i need the FBC Tuners for record multiple Channels ?
No i don´t caus all and everything is repeated until vomiting
Did i need FCC ? No i don´t cause it´s still,also after a lot Driver Updates,
buggy.
So all possible advantages are for me uninteresting
And to the end don´t forget
what can i do with a good hardware if the software can not do anything with it,remember
DM uses in the mine time OE 2.2 or the newer OE 2.5 what uses VU ?
Enigma 1.8
- Implement a "async uri resolving" proxy service technology called "eServiceUri/eUriResolver"eServiceUri brings the possibility to register an "eUriResolver" for custom transport-type-schemas.
An eUriResolver can be used to asynchronously resolve some arbitary "alias url" to a real streaming url and "standard" service type like eServiceMP3 or eServiceDVB.